Poll finds majority of college students feel rioting and looting is justified

More rioting and looting broke out in American cities this week. This time, it was Philadelphia consumed by violence after a police shooting. 

According to ABC News, at least 30 police officers have been injured in the violent unrest, while dozens of people have been arrested for rioting or vandalism. Mobs have descended on Walmart and rushed out carrying TVs, while other agitators ransacked Footlocker for new sneakers. The full number of businesses ravaged by the destruction is increasing and still being tallied.

This latest outbreak simply adds to the thousands of businesses, from Chicago to Minneapolis and beyond, that have been rioted, ransacked, burned down, or looted in the ongoing period of political unrest over police brutality, both real and imagined. All told, the damage from rioting in recent months will exceed any past period of civil unrest in American history, with even modest under-estimates putting the total cost at up to $2 billion

The outbreak of mass rioting and looting across America is alarming in its own right, but equally chilling is the public’s support for the violence. As first reported by the Washington Examiner’s Paul Bedard, a new poll finds that college students in particular overwhelmingly believe that rioting and looting is justified. 

The poll was conducted by Mclaughlin & Associate in conjunction with Yale University’s conservative William F. Buckley Program. It surveyed a nationally representative sample of 800 college students on a wide array of issues, from the coronavirus to race in America.

One key finding from the poll was that 64 percent of college students agreed that “the recent rioting and looting is justified to some degree.” Only 28 percent disagreed with this assessment.

Image Credit: McLaughlin & Associates

What this result really conveys is that many of today’s young people neither understand nor respect the importance of property rights in a free society. And this is deeply misguided. Even if you’re concerned about racism in America and support criminal justice reform, property rights are essential.

Why?

Property rights are human rights. As economist Murray Rothbard once explained:

.jQUqgc{background:#28abe2 !important;border-bottom-left-radius:30px !important;border-bottom-right-radius:30px !important;border-bottom-width:0px !important;border-color:rgba(0,0,0,.35) !important;border-left-width:0px !important;border-right-width:0px !important;border-style:none !important;border-top-left-radius:30px !important;border-top-right-radius:30px !important;border-top-width:0px !important;box-shadow:0px 0px 0px 0px #ffffff !important;color:#ffffff !important;font-family:Montserrat !important;font-size:22px !important;font-weight:700 !important;-webkit-letter-spacing:0 !important;-moz-letter-spacing:0 !important;-ms-letter-spacing:0 !important;letter-spacing:0 !important;line-height:1 !important;margin-bottom:20px !important;margin-left:0px !important;margin-right:0px !important;margin-top:0px !important;max-width:100% !important;padding-bottom:20px !important;padding-left:12px !important;padding-right:12px !important;padding-top:20px !important;text-transform:none !important;-webkit-text-decoration:none !important;text-decoration:none !important;font-style:initial !important;width:100% !important;cursor:pointer;}/*!sc*/ .jQUqgc.withIcon{display:-webkit-inline-box;display:-webkit-inline-flex;display:-ms-inline-flexbox;display:inline-flex;-webkit-box-pack:center;-webkit-justify-content:center;-ms-flex-pack:center;justify-content:center;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;-ms-flex-direction:row;-webkit-flex-direction:row;-ms-flex-direction:row;flex-direction:row;}/*!sc*/ .jQUqgc.withIcon:focus,.jQUqgc.withIcon:hover,.jQUqgc.withIcon.is-editing-hover{-ms-flex-direction:row;-webkit-flex-direction:row;-ms-flex-direction:row;flex-direction:row;}/*!sc*/ .jQUqgc .gilbert-icon–PNYGgukrB6RGziZeI264{color:#ffffff !important;margin-right:NaNpx !important;}/*!sc*/ .jQUqgc .gilbert-hover-icon–PNYGgukrB6RGziZeI264{display:none !important;color:#000000 !important;margin-right:NaNpx !important;}/*!sc*/ .jQUqgc:focus,.jQUqgc:hover,.jQUqgc.is-editing-hover{background:#4BB9E7 !important;}/*!sc*/ .jQUqgc:focus .gilbert-hover-icon–PNYGgukrB6RGziZeI264,.jQUqgc:hover .gilbert-hover-icon–PNYGgukrB6RGziZeI264,.jQUqgc.is-editing-hover .gilbert-hover-icon–PNYGgukrB6RGziZeI264{display:inline-block !important;}/*!sc*/ .jQUqgc:focus .gilbert-icon–PNYGgukrB6RGziZeI264,.jQUqgc:hover .gilbert-icon–PNYGgukrB6RGziZeI264,.jQUqgc.is-editing-hover .gilbert-icon–PNYGgukrB6RGziZeI264{display:inline-block !important;}/*!sc*/ data-styled.g1[id=”StyledIconButtonElement-sc-114x20d-0″]{content:”jQUqgc,”}/*!sc*/
html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas applet,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas object,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas div:not(.Campaign__content):not(.Row__content):not(.Column__content):not(.Element__content):not(.ignore-reset),html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas span:not(.ignore-reset),html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas iframe,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas h1:not(.ignore-reset),html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas h2:not(.ignore-reset),html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas h3:not(.ignore-reset),html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas h4:not(.ignore-reset),html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas h5:not(.ignore-reset),html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas h6:not(.ignore-reset),html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas p,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas blockquote,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas pre,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas a:not(.ignore-reset),html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas abbr,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas acronym,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas address,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas big,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas cite,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas code,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas del,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas dfn,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas em,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas img,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas ins,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas kbd,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas q,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas s,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas samp,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas small,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas strike,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas strong,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas sub,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas sup,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas tt,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas var,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas b,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas u,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas center,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas dl,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas dt,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas dd,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas ol:not(.ignore-reset),html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas ul:not(.ignore-reset),html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas li:not(.ignore-reset),html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas fieldset,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas form,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas label:not(.ignore-reset),html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas legend,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas table,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas caption,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas tbody,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas tfoot,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas thead,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas tr,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas th,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas td,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas article,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas aside,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas canvas,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas details,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas embed,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas figure,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas figcaption,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas footer,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas header,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas hgroup,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas menu,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas nav,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas output,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas ruby,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas section,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas summary,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas time,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas mark,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas audio,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas video,html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas i:not(.fa){margin: 0;padding: 0;border: 0;font-size: 100%;font: inherit;vertical-align: baseline;}html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas div.Campaign__content, html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas div.Row__content, html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas div.Column__content, html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas div.Element__content{margin: 0;border: 0;font-size: 100%;font: inherit;vertical-align: baseline;} html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas *:not(.ignore-reset){box-sizing:border-box} html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas .Element__content {min-height: 30px} html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-c-canvas button {width: auto;} html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-FieldsElement–wrapper input:not([type=”submit”]), html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-FieldsElement–wrapper select, html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-FieldsElement–wrapper textarea { background-color: #fff; width: 100%; height: auto; border: 1px solid; padding: 10px 6px; overflow: hidden; margin: 0; vertical-align: middle; font-style: normal; width: 100%; line-height: 1.5 } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-FieldsElement–wrapper textarea { height: 60px; } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-FieldsElement–wrapper textarea, html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-FieldsElement–wrapper input { overflow: hidden; -webkit-appearance: none; } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-FieldsElement–wrapper input[type=submit], html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-FieldsElement–wrapper button { cursor: pointer; } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-FieldsElement–wrapper input[type=checkbox], html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-FieldsElement–wrapper input[type=radio] { width: auto !important; outline: invert none medium; padding: 0; margin: 0; height: auto !important; box-shadow: none; -webkit-box-shadow: none; -moz-box-shadow: none; display: inline; } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-FieldsElement–wrapper input[type=checkbox] { -webkit-appearance: checkbox; } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-FieldsElement–wrapper input[type=radio] { -webkit-appearance: radio; } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-FieldsElement–wrapper.FieldsElement–vertical input { } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-FieldsElement–wrapper.FieldsElement–horizontal input, html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-FieldsElement–wrapper.FieldsElement–horizontal button { } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-FieldsElement–wrapper.FieldsElement–horizontal .FieldsElement–privacyText { } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-FieldsElement–wrapper strong { font-weight: bolder; } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-FieldsElement–wrapper em { font-style: italic; } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-FieldsElement–wrapper ul { list-style-type: disc; margin: 1em 0 1em 1.5em; } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-FieldsElement–wrapper ol { list-style: decimal; margin: 1em 0 1em 1.5em; } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-FieldsElement–wrapper sup { top: -0.5em; } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-FieldsElement–wrapper sub { bottom: -0.5em; } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-FieldsElement–wrapper sub, html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-FieldsElement–wrapper sup { font-size: 75%; line-height: 0; position: relative; vertical-align: baseline; } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-FieldsElement–wrapper p { margin: 0 0 5px; font-weight: inherit !important; line-height: inherit !important; letter-spacing: inherit !important; text-transform: inherit !important; } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-FieldsElement–wrapper p:first-of-type { margin-top: 0; } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-FieldsElement–wrapper p:last-of-type { margin-bottom: 0; } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-TextElement–content strong { font-weight: bolder; } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-TextElement–content em { font-style: italic; } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-TextElement–content ul:not(.ignore-reset) { list-style-type: disc; margin: 1em 0 1em 1.5em; } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-TextElement–content ol:not(.ignore-reset) { list-style: decimal; margin: 1em 0 1em 1.5em; } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-TextElement–content sup { top: -0.5em; } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-TextElement–content sub { bottom: -0.5em; } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-TextElement–content sub, html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-TextElement–content sup { font-size: 75%; line-height: 0; position: relative; vertical-align: baseline; } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-TextElement–content p { margin: 0 0 5px; font-weight: inherit !important; letter-spacing: inherit !important; text-transform: inherit !important; } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-TextElement–content span.fr-emoticon { vertical-align: middle !important; } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-TextElement–content p:first-of-type { margin-top: 0; } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-TextElement–content p:last-of-type { margin-bottom: 0; } @media screen and (min-width: 1px) and (max-width: 768px) { html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-ClosePosition–top-right { right: 0 !important } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-ClosePosition–top-left { left: 0 !important } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-ClosePosition–bottom-right { right: 0 !important } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .gilbert-ClosePosition–bottom-left { left: 0 !important } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .Row .Row__content { flex-direction: column; } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .Row .Row__content .Column { width: 100% !important; } html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .FieldsElement–horizontal:not(‘.FieldsElement–horizontal’) input, html div#om-lxkcubhhqwmdm0lkjkbp .FieldsElement–horizontal button { width: 100% !important; } }@media screen and (min-width: 1px) and (max-width: 400px) {}
d12e9117613a1599144490-donate-thankyou-landscape.png

Join us in preserving the principles of economic freedom and individual liberty for the rising generation

Support FEE’s Mission

The human right of every man to his own life implies the right to find and transform resources: to produce that which sustains and advances life. That product is a man’s property. That is why prop­erty rights are foremost among human rights and why any loss of one endangers the others.

Many left-leaning young people likely rooted their disdain for property rights in the notion that they only really matter to “Big Business” or “the rich.” (And themselves, of course). This is mistaken. In fact, the rich, safe neighborhoods aren’t the ones being looted. The destructive acts are disproportionately victimizing urban, poorer neighborhoods and minority-owned businesses

And the long-term fallout of attacks on property rights haunts society’s most vulnerable the most. As famed economist Thomas Sowell put it, property rights “belong legally to individuals, but their real function is social, to benefit vast numbers of people who do not themselves exercise these rights.”

Even if you’re concerned about racism in America and support criminal justice reform, property rights are essential to progress.

Why? Well, property rights are the foundation of a capitalist economy. 

The calculation of costs and benefits that underlies a profit-driven economy relies on the protection of property rights. If business owners and investors can’t feel secure in their property in an area, they take their investment elsewhere. This means that in areas that are looted, there are fewer jobs and fewer opportunities over time.

Hence, as Sowell observed, property rights serve everyone

So, if young people really care about social justice, they shouldn’t downplay and justify looting. They ought to understand that no matter the cause, violating property rights isn’t “progressive” at all. 

Brad Polumbo
Brad Polumbo

Brad Polumbo (@Brad_Polumbo) is a libertarian-conservative journalist and Opinion Editor at the Foundation for Economic Education.

This article was originally published on FEE.org. Read the original article.

U.S. Department of Education issues important new free speech and religious liberty regulations

The Department of Education released new, final regulations this past week, providing crucial free speech and religious liberty protections for students at our nation’s public college campuses. Institutions that violate those core rights will risk losing access to federal education grants. The regulations require public institutions of higher education to do what they are already obligated to do: protect the First Amendment rights of their students.

The new regulations also require from private institutions what many courts already require: that the institutions comply with their stated institutional policies regarding freedom of speech and academic freedom. If a court finds that a private institution violated its policies, it risks losing access to Department of Education grants.

Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

Under the new rules, religious student organizations must also have equal access to the benefits colleges afford to recognize secular organizations. This means that public institutions of education may no longer discriminate against religious student organizations by denying them access to campus facilities or student fee money available to secular student organizations “because of the religious student organization’s beliefs, practices, policies, speech, membership standards, or leadership standards, which are informed by sincerely held religious beliefs.”

“Too many institutions violate student and faculty free speech rights as a matter of course,” said FIRE Legislative and Policy Director Joe Cohn. “Hopefully, the additional risk of losing federal grant money will encourage them to rethink their practices.” FIRE is cautiously optimistic about the new regulations, which have the potential to reward institutional respect for and attention to core civil liberties. However, these regulations are not without risk. Because institutions risk losing access to federal grants if they lose a First Amendment lawsuit, there is a possibility that institutions will change the way they litigate those lawsuits. It may also affect the way judges decide First Amendment cases, knowing that large federal grants may be at stake.“It is not too much to ask of our nation’s colleges and universities that they follow the First Amendment or keep their own free speech promises if they wish to receive federal grant money,” said FIRE Executive Director Robert Shibley. “As always, FIRE stands ready to assist any institution wishing to join those who already ensure that their policies protect free speech.

” The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to defending and sustaining the individual rights of students and faculty members at America’s colleges and universities. These rights include freedom of speech, freedom of association, due process, legal equality, religious liberty, and sanctity of conscience — the essential qualities of liberty.

A quick look at Google’s higher education model shows why colleges should be worried

My wife and I recently hired a financial advisor who is helping us map out our financial future.

He seemed stunned that we didn’t want to take advantage of the US tax code’s 529 provision, which helps parents save for their children’s education.

“You have three kids,” he said. “Odds are at least one will go to college. It’s a no-brainer.”

We nonetheless demurred. I like shaving my tax liability as much as the next guy, but the truth is both my wife and I have serious doubts about higher education. Though we both attended college ourselves, options today look less promising than they once did.

College might have been a “no-brainer” at one time for parents and students who could afford it, but that is no longer the case. Soaring costs, grade inflation, diminishing degree value, the politicization of campuses, and a host of other issues have made the once-clear benefits of college less clear.

Despite all this, a large part of me still wants my kids to go to college because it feels like so few other options are available. That could be changing, however.

In July Kent Walker, Google’s Senior Vice President for Global Affairs and Chief Legal Officer, announced on Twitter that the company was expanding its education options.

It was a direct salvo at America’s higher education industry.

“College degrees are out of reach for many Americans, and you shouldn’t need a college diploma to have economic security,” Walker wrote on Google’s blog. “We need new, accessible job-training solutions—from enhanced vocational programs to online education—to help America recover and rebuild.”

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

To be sure, it’s hard to imagine anyone taking on America’s $600 billion higher education industry. Nevertheless, a quick look at Google’s model shows why colleges should be worried.

Google is launching various professional courses that offer training for specific high-paying jobs that are in high demand. Program graduates can earn a “Google Career Certificate” in one of the following positions: Project manager ($93,000); Data analyst ($66,000); UX designer ($75,000).

While Google didn’t say how much it would cost to earn a certificate, if it’s anything close to Google’s IT Support Professional Certificate, the cost is quite low, especially compared to college.

That Google IT support program costs enrollees $49 per month. That means a six-month program would cost about $300—about what many college students cough up on textbooks alone in a semester, Inc points out.

Compare that price tag to that of college, where students on average pay about $30,000 per yearwhen tuition, housing, room and board, fees, and other expenses are factored in.

Unlike college, Google won’t just hand you a diploma and send you away, however. The company has promised to assist graduates in their job searches, connecting them with employers such as Intel, Bank of America, Hulu, Walmart, and Best Buy.

Graduates will also be eligible for one of the hundreds of apprenticeship opportunities the company is offering.

In economics we use a simple term to talk about something’s worth: value. We know that value is subjective. But if consumers freely purchase something, it suggests consumers place a value on that good higher than the price.

Judging the value of a degree is tricky, however. It’s not like buying steak at a grocery store. Buyers are mostly shielded from the costs in the short term, and the benefits of the purchase are extended out over many years.

We know that for many students, college is a wonderful investment that increases their earnings, while for others it will turn out to be a poor investment because they don’t graduate or they acquire job skills that do not translate into increased earnings. (For example: I was a bartender after I received my undergraduate degree; I didn’t make more money because I had a degree.)

We also know that the prices and value change over time. In the case of higher education, prices have increased sharply in the last 30 years while the value has diminished.

As Arthur C. Brooks pointed out in The Atlantic in July, from 1989-2016 university costs in tuition and fees increased by 98 percent in real dollars (inflation-adjusted), about 11 times that of the median household income.

At the same time, there is compelling evidence that while the price of college is increasing sharply, the value of degrees is diminishing because of a surplus of college diplomas.

For parents like myself, the idea of spending $350,000 to send my three children to university is, to be frank, slightly nauseating. All things being equal, I don’t see the value there. (As I tell my wife, however, this doesn’t mean I won’t send my child to Princeton if he or she is admitted and I believe college is the right fit for that particular child.) Over the last couple of years, whenever I’d think about my children’s futures, I’d find myself growing more and more nervous.

If not college, then what? Why are there not better options? There’s a huge need.

The beautiful thing about free markets is that needs do not go unmet for very long. In a free system, innovation has a way of filling the gaps to fulfill what consumers want.

Google’s expansion of its accreditation system offers two things young people (and their parents) highly value: 1) job training skills; and 2) prestige.

Do not underestimate the power of the latter. Prestige mattes a lot. In fact, when you look at actual education many college students receive today, prestige is what they’re purchasing, not education.

The value of degrees might have been diminishing for years, but parents and kids could still rationalize the excessive costs because there was a certain amount of status and recognition conferred simply for being in college and then graduating.

Major corporations like Google have more to offer than they realize. In today’s marketplace, having Google on a resume can offer the same prestige as a university—and arguably far more in terms of job skills.

Once corporations figure out their brand can offer commodities consumers want—job-training and validation—it could disrupt the current education model. It’s possible corporations could also bring on a resurgence of the once-popular apprenticeship-style learning that can be traced back to the Code of Hammurabi in Ancient Babylon through to business-training programs of today like Praxis and Google.

At the very least, programs like Google Career Certificates will offer much-needed competition to the university system and additional options to young people looking to take their next step in the world.

Parents of the world, rejoice!

Jon Miltimore
Jon Miltimore

Jonathan Miltimore is the Managing Editor of FEE.org. His writing/reporting has been the subject of articles in TIME magazine, The Wall Street Journal, CNN, Forbes, Fox News, and the Star Tribune.

Bylines: The Washington Times, MSN.com, The Washington Examiner, The Daily Caller, The Federalist, the Epoch Times. 

This article was originally published on FEE.org. Read the original article.

D.C. Parents and Day Care Providers Sue to Stop Rule Requiring Providers to Earn College Degree to Watch Kids

Taking care of a child takes a lot of things—patience, creativity, and kindness rank high among many other attributes—but the one thing it doesn’t take is a college degree. But don’t tell that to Washington, D.C. regulators in the Office of the State Superintendent of Education (OSSE), which recently enacted a regulation requiring the city’s daycare providers to either obtain a college degree or look for another job.

 

For Ilumi Sanchez, a D.C. daycare provider who has taken care of dozens of children since 1995, the regulation—which takes effect next year—will be devastating. Between the time she spends watching nine kids during the day and taking care of her family in the evening, earning an unnecessary college diploma is a non-starter. That is only compounded by her limited English skills and the five-figure cost of tuition. Once the regulation takes effect, Ilumi’s only choice will be to either shut down or move elsewhere and leave behind the families that have grown to see her as a part of their family.

That’s why, Ilumi, along with a parent and another daycare provider, partnered with the Institute for Justice to file a federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of D.C.’s daycare education regulation. The lawsuit argues that the OSSE overstepped its authority and violated the plaintiffs’ rights under the U.S. Constitution.

“You don’t need to know how to integrate a function or write in iambic pentameter in order to take care of a newborn or toddler,” said Renée Flaherty, an attorney at the Institute for Justice, which represents the plaintiffs. “Daycare providers already go through a battery of training covering real-world needs like first aid and early development enrichment. Requiring them to spend two to four years studying subjects like English literature, math, or public speaking will only serve to drive them out of business, drive up daycare costs, and make finding a daycare in the District even more impossible than it already is.”

It is not just common sense that it doesn’t take a college degree to take care of a kid. Science bears that out, too. In 2015, the National Academies of Science released a comprehensive report on early childhood education, which found that there is no conclusive evidence demonstrating that a college degree would have beneficial effects on early childhood development.

The OSSE’s arbitrary rule, which was passed without input or oversight by the city council, comes at a time when D.C.’s childcare marketplace is already strained beyond the breaking point. District parents pay more for childcare than in any other state—an average of $23,089 per year for an infant. Waitlists for a spot at a daycare center can run over a year. It is not uncommon for parents who get on a waitlist as soon as they are pregnant to find themselves without a spot once their child is born nine months later. In 2015, licensed day care providers had roughly 7,610 slots for the 22,000 children under age three in D.C.

“Taking care of kids takes more specialized and personal traits—experience like caring

illumi-IFJ_2271.jpg
Ilumi Sanchez (Photo Credit: Institute for Justice)

and patience, not reading and writing,” said Ilumi Sanchez. “They don’t teach those skills in college. You learn those by doing them—and I’ve been doing them for nearly 25 years.”

 

Ilumi continued: “I love my job because I love kids. It is hard to have a bad day doing what I do. But, since the regulation passed, it has been hard to stay positive. Families depend on me, and I depend on them. I may not have a degree, but that doesn’t mean I don’t know what I’m doing.”

“We love our daycare,” said Jill Homan, a D.C. mother whose daughter attends a D.C. daycare. “They give our daughter exactly what she needs—a warm and welcoming environment where she can learn and play. Our daycare providers are nearly family members, and we’d be devastated to lose them because of an arbitrary regulation.”

In 2017, following widespread outrage by parents and providers alike, OSSE proposed extending, but not eliminating the education requirements. Now, five months later, it has taken no action on the proposal. In the meanwhile, the rules start going into effect in eight months.

“As people across the political spectrum recognize the enormous burdens created by unnecessary occupational licenses, D.C. officials have chosen to make the problem worse by demanding an empty credential in order to care for a two-year-old,” said Robert McNamara, a senior attorney at the Institute for Justice. “D.C.’s regulation is only the latest example of how arbitrary and unjustified occupational regulations serve to lock people out of making a living doing jobs they know and love. Ilumi and hundreds of other daycare providers have a constitutional right to earn an honest living.”

Florida Senate Judiciary Committee Should Seize Opportunity to Protect Free Speech on Campus

Tallahassee, Fla – Today, the Florida Senate Judiciary Committee will vote on whether or not to advance SB 1234, also known as the Campus Free Expression Act. The bill will improve the free speech climate at Florida’s publicly funded college and university campuses by ending so-called “free speech zones.” These deceptively titled zones actually restrict students from exercising their constitutionally-protected First Amendment rights by restricting free expression to sanctioned and pre-determined zones. The legislation would also make it easier for students who have their speech rights violated to force their schools to comply with the First Amendment.

Generation Opportunity-Florida (GO-FL) is providing testimony at today’s hearing and is fully supportive of both the House and Senate versions of the bill introduced respectively by Rep. Bob Rommel (R-HD106) and Sen. Dennis Baxley (R-SD12).

GO-FL Coalitions Director Demetrius Minor issued the following statement:

“College is a place where young people learn to express themselves and challenge ideas that go against their beliefs, but that dialogue will never occur if free speech is forced into the remote and empty corners of our campuses. We don’t always agree with every single viewpoint expressed on campuses across our state, but disagreeing with an opinion does not give us license to deny someone’s First Amendment right to voice it. We appreciate the time and attention the Florida Senate Judiciary Committee is giving SB 1234 and encourage them to advance it without delay.”

Recently, Minor posted a video addressing the importance of free speech on campus, where he asked viewers to consider the historical impact Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s March on Washington would have had if it had been designated to a “free speech zone” rather than the National Mall. View the full video here.

Earlier this year, Generation Opportunity launched a mail campaign urging Floridians to thank Sen. Baxley and Rep. Rommel for introducing House and Senate versions of the Campus Free Expression Act. Click on the hyperlinks to view the full-size images of the mail pieces for Rep. Rommel and Sen. Baxley.

According to the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), nearly one in six universities maintain free speech zones – a space designed to limit your ability to hold “rallies, demonstrations, distribute literature, circulate petitions and give speeches.” Permission is usually required to use these “speech zones,” and applications must be approved by the university days or even weeks in advance. GO-FL believes the entire college campus should be a free speech zone, not just one area.

A recent Brookings Institute Study found one in five college students surveyed said using violence against a speaker known for making offensive statements was acceptable.

To learn more about the Campus Free Expression Act, click here.

College students descend on West Palm Beach to learn more about free markets

While some college students will be down in Boca Raton living off the largess of our government spending taxpayer money at the Boca Raton Bowl, others will be in West Palm Beach enjoying speeches by conservatives warning against such corporate welfare. Turning Point USA‘s Student Action Summit kicks off tonight at the Palm Beach County Convention Center featuring Donald Trump, Jr., Charlie Kirk, Dennis Prager, Dinesh D’Souza, and Ben Shapiro.

The four-day event will educate students about the importance of fiscal responsibility, TPUSA_logo_menubarfree markets, and limited government. Wednesday morning a discussion on criminal justice reform will be lead by Doug Deason, followed in the afternoon with a debate on the legalization of marijuana with Austin Petersen and Jeff Hunt. Other notable speakers for the event are Greg Gutfeld, Guy Benson, Jesse Watters, James O’Keefe, Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, Anthony Scaramucci, and many others.

We will be covering the event, so look for additional articles during the week.

 

Flagler College sees the error of their ways concerning student free speech

ST. AUGUSTINE, Fla. — Flagler College has retroactively granted permission to a studentflagler-college-st.-augustine-florida-feat to exercise her expressive rights with a “free speech ball” event —  but only days after the event occurred, and after initially prohibiting her from hosting it at all. Flagler’s decision followed a letter last Friday from the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) warning the school to uphold the student’s rights.
Last Thursday, Flagler administrators told student Kelli Huck that she would not be allowed to host the free speech event she had planned for that Friday because the event was not sponsored by a recognized student group — despite the fact she had twice attempted to form a Young Americans for Liberty chapter on campus. The Student Government Association denied both of her applications for official student group recognition because members perceived the prospective organization as trending “towards one certain political agenda.” FIRE wrote to Flagler earlier in March, urging the administration to overturn the student government’s viewpoint-discriminatory decisions, and is still awaiting a response.
“We are glad that Flagler College ultimately vindicated Kelli’s expressive right to hold a free speech ball event, but the university should never have placed her in the position of having to risk disciplinary action in order to engage in free expression,” said Ari Cohn, director of FIRE’s Individual Rights Defense Program. “The idea that only members of student groups — and not individuals — have a voice on Flagler’s campus is deeply troubling and runs counter to the ideals that Flagler claims to value.”
On Thursday, the day before the free speech ball event took place, Director of Student Activities Timothy Mellon and Vice President of Student Services Daniel Stewart informed Huck that it would be “unfair” if she did not go through the same registration process as student groups. Mellon and Stewart originally warned Huck that she could use only the public road that went through campus, not Flagler’s grounds, essentially saying her voice stops where Flagler’s campus starts.
Even though Flagler is a private university and not legally bound by the First Amendment, it is both morally and contractually bound to honor the it has made to its students.
Following FIRE’s letter, Huck was told that her event was “retroactively approved” and that she was permitted to host her already-completed campus event as an individual.
“Seeing all the different opinions, arguments, positive thoughts, and responses was breathtaking,” said Huck. “Flagler students loved expressing themselves. This is what college is about.”
The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to defending liberty, freedom of speech, due process, academic freedom, legal equality, and freedom of conscience on America’s college campuses.

France shows that ‘free’ college is neither free nor fair

From certain perspectives, the French higher education system would seem to be doinguniversity_of_paris great. There are numerous prestigious schools, thousands of students attend them, and the government has spent millions upon millions of euros since the 1980s in subsidizing both students and universities. But looks are deceiving. In fact, the number of students failing to pass their first year is at a record high, universities are overcrowded, infrastructure is in dire need of renovation, and youth unemployment is closing in on 30% (the European Union average is 20%). It turns out that free and fair are neither free nor fair.

The Historical Context

These subsidies have created a generation of people who attend college because it is free, even if an apprenticeship might suit them better.

The movement toward government-subsidized academia indeed has a deep historical context in France going back to 1985. President François Mitterrand (1981-1995) followed the Keynesian dogma of his Minister of Education Jean-Pierre Chevènement, according to which more students means higher levels of employment, higher salaries, and greater purchasing power. To achieve this goal, the government sought to push the number young people in higher education to 80%.

However, some young people who do not live near a university, can’t afford the living costs and tuition, or simply don’t want to pursue a degree will not necessarily attend a university. So Mitterrand did what he could do best: spend as much money as possible. Today, tuition fees vary. For some students, they tend towards €15, but even international students don’t pay more than €200 for a year. Student subsidies also vary, but an average student now makes between €250-400 a month and a housing stipend of up to €175.

Despite these efforts, the French economy has been falling behind ever since these initiatives began and youth unemployment has had drastic ups and downs. Compare that to the United Kingdom, which didn’t support their students with welfare and managed to maintain lower unemployment and recover more quickly after recessions. This has to do with the British tendency to allow more flexibility in the labor market, which makes it easier for young people to enter the workforce.

Why Are French Universities Overcrowded?

In the year 2015 my own French faculty made lecture attendance optional, not because they believed students to be self-motivated enough to learn the material on their own, but because there simply weren’t enough seats for all the students.

2014 data show that only 30% of French students get their bachelor degree without resetting a year, only 43.8% make it from first to second year.

If you subsidize something, you get more of it. These subsidies have effectively created a generation of young people who attend college because it is free, even if an apprenticeship might suit them better. Their education costs their neighbors large amounts of money and costs them several years of their lives that could have been spent learning more relevant skills.

But free college wasn’t enough; France also wanted it to be fair. To that end, France got rid of the ‘elitist’ system of getting accepted to a university. For many years, admission to a university required an entry exam or good grades: the numerus clausus. The French government got rid of that, opening the floodgates for thousands of students who otherwise would have been rejected. The effects of this have been especially pronounced in social sciences, law, international relations, history, and medicine. Since that time, only medical schools have successfully lobbied to get the restrictions reintroduced.

Unable to manage the overpopulation by limiting admission or increasing tuition, French universities have turned to a third way to deal with the problem.

Why Do So Many Students Fail?

2014 data show that only 30% of French students get their bachelor degree without resetting a year, only 43.8% make it from first to second year, and a solid 19% leave university with no diploma whatsoever. Why is that? Some of it obviously has to do with the decline in the quality of public secondary education, but degrees are also more difficult to acquire than they were before. New law students are told:

“Only 10% of you will actually make it to the next year. At least we hope so. We have no idea where to put you if more of you make it.”

Instead of making the system free and fair, higher education becomes increasingly expensive for taxpayers and increasingly difficult for students.

Internet classes have made students more autonomous and challenged the status quo of the old-school higher education system.

Universities need to take matters back into their own hands with autonomous budgeting and revised application policies. These changes could reduce government spending waste and rebalance the number of students pursuing higher education. But if universities want to survive in the future, even larger structural changes will be necessary. Universities will need to invest to match standards of current technology, curricula need to be revised and unnecessary subjects need to be cut, even if that means people being laid off. The entire higher education system needs to embrace and the rise of alternative education methods and incorporate it into curricula.

Innovation through Private Initiatives

As the richness of the internet becomes fully incorporated into higher education, consumers will have a greater number of options for pursuing education. Thousands of online platforms already offer online classes and the number of students doing their work from home continues to increase. French universities insist on a system of hundreds of students in enormous auditoriums listening to a professor for hours while stenographically writing down a monotonous speech. We can do better than that.

Internet classes have made students more autonomous and challenged the status quo of the old-school higher education system. This is the educational system of the 21st century. But instead of joining this movement of innovation, state-run schools write it off.

Higher education needs to innovate to survive. The dull system we have now does not help students. It is neither free nor fair.

Bill Wirtz


Bill Wirtz

Bill Wirtz studies French Law at the University of Lorraine in Nancy, France.

This article was originally published on FEE.org. Read the original article.